Commonwealth v. Younger, T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “the general rule of statutory construction that the burden of proving justification or exemption under a special exception to the prohibitions of a statute generally rests on one who claims its benefits”
• explaining that to state an unlawful price-discrimination claim, the plaintiff must allege “that a seller had charged one purchaser a higher price for like goods than he had charged one or more of the purchaser’s competitors”
• applying this general rule of statutory construction to the Anti-Injunction Act
• a showing that price discrimination was sufficient in amount to influence resale prices was \in itself ... adequate to show competitive injury\
• a showing that price discrimination was sufficient in amount to influence resale prices was “in itself ... adequate to show competitive injury”
• “discrimination” requires at least two sales by a single person at different prices to different customers in competition with each other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).