Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1/4/1984

Commonwealth v. Yelle

Citations

459 N.E.2d 461
390 Mass. 678
1984 Mass. LEXIS 1261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

Commonwealth has no right to an interlocutory appeal from the allowance of a motion to admit evidence
Commonwealth has no right to an interlocutory appeal from the allowance of a motion to admit evidence
“General Laws c. 211, § 3, relief is not a means for second guessing a trial judge’s evidentiary rulings”
G. L. c. 211, § 3, should not be invoked to second guess trial judge’s mlings
G. L. c. 211, § 3, should not be invoked simply to second guess trial court judge's interlocutory evidentiary rulings
trial judge's allowance of defendant's motion for admission of evidence of rape victim's sexual conduct was not equivalent to a ruling under Mass. R. Crim. P. 15 (b) (1), therefore Commonwealth had no right of interlocutory appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Liacos, Abrams, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.