Commonwealth v. Xander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding refusal enhancements were not applicable because the officer never attempted to administer warnings to highly-uncooperative detainee
• concluding officer required to provide defendant with [75 Pa.C.S.A. §] 1547(b) warnings7 before he could suffer enhanced penalties, which included civil consequences of suspension of operating privileges
• refusal to submit to chemical testing necessarily requires knowing refusal insofar as police must have provided arrestee with warnings beforehand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).