Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wright

Citations

  • 227 Pa. Super. 134
  • 323 A.2d 349
  • 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Evidence which is admissible for one purpose does not become inadmissible merely because it would be inadmissible if offered for another purpose.”
  • \Evidence which is admissible for one purpose does not become inadmissible merely because it would be inadmissible if offered for another purpose.\
  • accused, police officer, confers funds upon fellow police officer in exchange for latter’s protection of gambling operation
  • accused, police officer, confers funds upon fellow police officer in exchange for latter's protection of gambling operation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, McGlynn, Spaeth, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.