Commonwealth v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that regardless of who fired the shot, the petitioner and his companions were acting in concert with one another and therefore, he was responsible for the crime as an 5 But see Commonwealth v. Baldwin, 985 A.2d 830, 833 (Pa. 2009
• where evidence established that defendant and his compatriots acted in concert and collusion, defendant could be convicted of murder of the third degree and possessing an instrument of crime even though it was not proved that defendant fired fatal shot
• where evidence established that defendant and his compatriots acted in concert and collusion, defendant could be convicted of murder of the third degree and possessing an instrument of crime even though it was not proved that defendant fired fatal shot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Gladden
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-26· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Ruffin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Zoller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-07· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bradley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-14· cited 14×