Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/26/1998
Commonwealth v. Wilson
Citations
- 707 A.2d 1114
- 550 Pa. 518
- 1998 Pa. LEXIS 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, under the standard announced in Commonwealth v. Lively, 530 Pa. 464, 610 A.2d 7 (1992), a prior inconsistent statement may be used as substantive evidence when it is an au-diotaped or videotaped recording
- disallowing use of officer's notes of prior statements made by minor victims
- disallowing use of officer's notes of prior statements made by minor victims
- i.e., he does not challenge the admission of a prior inconsistent, unrecorded, oral statement of Mr. Phillips, which implicated Appellant
- for purposes of Brady, verbatim account of prior inconsistent statement that is tape-recorded is made under highly reliable circumstances
- for purposes of Brady, verbatim account of prior inconsistent statement that is tape-recorded is made under highly reliable circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Gappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-21· cited 299×
- Commonwealth v. Reid, A., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-20· cited 194×
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-31· cited 112×
- In re A.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-30· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. BibbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-07· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-05· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-10· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. BufordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-08· cited 39×
- State v. GiantMontana Supreme Court· 2001-06-08· cited 16×
- State v. GiantMontana Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. SholcoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-09· cited 9×
- In Re ADSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-30
- In Re: Order Amending Rules 803.1 and 804, and Approving the Revision of the Comment to Rule 613 of the Pennsylvania of Pennsylvania Rules of EvidenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-01
- Collins v. MeyersThird Circuit· 2003-08-29
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 541×
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-19· cited 271×
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-26· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-18· cited 160×
- Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-29· cited 111×
- Homrich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-02-20· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-31· cited 85×
- Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-10· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-27· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. LoudenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-11· cited 31×
- Bergdoll v. KaneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-05-19· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. HalstedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.