Commonwealth v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• judge not required to consider the availability of insurance proceeds in determining the restitution order
• victim’s testimony and cost estimates prepared by vendor sufficient to justify restitution award where victim was subject to cross-examination and defendant was given opportunity to present his own evidence to rebut victim’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Casanova
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-03-13· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Buckley
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-09-08· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Malick
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-08-25· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Avram A.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2013-01-30· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-04-17

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Nawn
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-02-07· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. McIntyre
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-05-15· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Yeshulas
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-05-08· cited 8×