Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/14/2019
Commonwealth v. Williams
Citations
- 204 A.3d 489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a vague Rule 1925(b) statement hampered appellate review and finding issue waived
- reiterating that “[w]hen the trial court has to guess what issues an appellant is appealing, that is not enough for meaningful review” (citation omitted
- noting that once a court grants counsel’s petition to withdraw pursuant to Turner and Finley, new counsel shall not be appointed
- stating that where issues in a 1925(b) statement are too vague for the trial court to identify and address, appellate review is hampered and the issue is waived
- stating, “when a defendant pleads guilty, he waives the right to challenge anything but the legality of his sentence and the validity of his plea.” (citation omitted)
- “[w]hen a defendant pleads guilty, he waives the right to challenge anything but the legality of his sentence and the validity of his plea.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lazarus, Stabile, McLaughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Walker, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-01· cited 1,340×
- Commonwealth v. RykardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-18· cited 631×
- Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-06-01· cited 374×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-28· cited 174×
- Commonwealth v. LemonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-07-17· cited 142×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-08-06· cited 94×
- In the Interest of: P.S., a Minor, Appeal of: P.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-17· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. MapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-08· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.