Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 204 A.3d 489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a vague Rule 1925(b) statement hampered appellate review and finding issue waived
  • reiterating that “[w]hen the trial court has to guess what issues an appellant is appealing, that is not enough for meaningful review” (citation omitted
  • noting that once a court grants counsel’s petition to withdraw pursuant to Turner and Finley, new counsel shall not be appointed
  • stating that where issues in a 1925(b) statement are too vague for the trial court to identify and address, appellate review is hampered and the issue is waived
  • stating, “when a defendant pleads guilty, he waives the right to challenge anything but the legality of his sentence and the validity of his plea.” (citation omitted)
  • “[w]hen a defendant pleads guilty, he waives the right to challenge anything but the legality of his sentence and the validity of his plea.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Stabile, McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.