Supreme Court of Virginia· 3/1/2018
Commonwealth v. Williams
Citations
- 809 S.E.2d 672
- 295 Va. 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e regularly reject invitations to ‘read into [a] statute language that is not there,’ because of the long-established rule that ‘[c]ourts cannot add language to [a] statute the General Assembly has not seen fit to include.’” (second, third, and fourth alterations in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwyn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conyers v. MARTIAL ARTS WORLD OF RICHMONDSupreme Court of Virginia· 2007-01-12· cited 300×
- Zinone v. LEE'S CROSSING HOMEOWNERS ASS'NSupreme Court of Virginia· 2011-09-16· cited 88×
- Jackson v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2005-03-03· cited 74×
- Cook v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2004-06-10· cited 63×
- Holsapple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2003-10-31· cited 63×
- Beck v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia· 2004-03-05· cited 51×
- Hampton Roads Sanitation District Commission v. City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia· 1978-01-13· cited 34×
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1949-11-21· cited 31×
- Johnson v. WoodardSupreme Court of Virginia· 2011-03-04· cited 22×
- Williams v. Augusta County School BoardSupreme Court of Virginia· 1994-06-10· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. MalbonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-11-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.