Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/12/2017
Commonwealth v. Williams
Citations
- 154 A.3d 336
- 2017 Pa. Super. 7
- 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court erred in not permitting store owner and police officer to testify as to what they saw on video footage because there was no bad faith shown on part of Commonwealth when store owner inadvertently destroyed footage
- Reversing trial court's suppression of testimony regarding content oflost surveillance video capturing underlying crime, and remanding, after holding that such testimony was admissible, despite defendant being denied opportunity to view.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Shogan, Strassburger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-29· cited 319×
- Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-10-14· cited 270×
- Commonwealth v. KornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-25· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. SpottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-05· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.