Commonwealth v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• though observations through a \Startron\ night scope were unreasonable under the circumstances, observations with ordinary binoculars were not
• though observations through a “Startron” night scope were unreasonable under the circumstances, observations with ordinary binoculars were not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Carelli
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-15· cited 54×
• Commonwealth v. Oglialoro
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-01· cited 17×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-30· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Maloney
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-10· cited 2×
• Fourth Amendment Implications of Military Use of Forward Looking Infrared Radars Technology for Civilian Law Enforcement
  Office of Legal Counsel· 1992-03-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Griswold v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
• Commonwealth v. Hernley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-19· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Santiago
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-23· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Heacock
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-17· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-04· cited 14×