Commonwealth v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel was ineffective for proceeding by way of stipulated evidence because counsel failed to ensure that defendant was informed that he was relinquishing the right to cross-examine witnesses
• counsel was ineffective for proceeding by way of stipulated evidence because counsel failed to ensure that defendant was informed that he was relinquishing the right to cross-examine witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ruiz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-27· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Presbury
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-01· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hubbard
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 854×
• Commonwealth v. Dancer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 407×
• Commonwealth v. Mabie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 129×
• Commonwealth v. Via
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 104×
• Samuel L. Julian v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1956-08-17· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Gilmore
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Nance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-04· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-15· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Bridell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Waters
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-25· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Doman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-15· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Eagle
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 2×