Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/3/1981
Commonwealth v. Williams
Citations
- 428 A.2d 165
- 285 Pa. Super. 515
- 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that circumstantial evidence may used to prove that the substance possessed by the appellant was a controlled substance
- corruption of minors charge based upon exposing minor to illegal narcotic drug use
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Hoffman, Van Voort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SlocumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-21· cited 115×
- Commonwealth v. StasiakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-08· cited 43×
- Cimino v. Yale UniversityD. Connecticut· 1986-06-30· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-22· cited 9×
- Com. v. Duncan, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-04-17· cited 4×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.