Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

  • 652 A.2d 283
  • 539 Pa. 249
  • 1994 Pa. LEXIS 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[t]he legislature is perfectly free to enact a sentencing scheme which rejects the ‘recidivist philosophy’ and focuses on other goals of the penal system”
  • noting “five broad purposes of the penal system: protection of society, general deterrence ..., individual deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution”
  • rejecting the argument that the mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508(a)(3)(i) applies only if the defendant has a prior drug trafficking conviction at the time he committed the offense
  • noting “five broad purposes of the penal system: -9- J. S47035/17 protection of society, general deterrence . . . , individual deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution”
  • noting “five broad purposes of the penal system: protection of society, general deterrence . . ., individual deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution.” (emphasis added)
  • rejecting the argument that the mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508(a)(3)(i) applies only if the defendant has a prior drug trafficking conviction at the time he committed the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.