Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/23/2006
Commonwealth v. Wiley
Citations
- 904 A.2d 905
- 588 Pa. 391
- 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “under the independent source doctrine, -5- J-S71027-19 the search warrant, which was supported by probable cause and bore no taint of the prior illegality. See id.; and (3
- per curiam order dismissing appeal, as improvidently granted; separate dissents by Justices Newman and Eakin, argue that merits disposition would permit discussion of differences between inevitable discovery and independent source doctrines as exceptions to exclusionary rule
- per curiam order dismissing appeal, as improvidently granted; separate dissents by Justices Newman and Eakin, argue that merits disposition would permit discussion of differences between inevitable discovery and independent source doctrines as exceptions to exclusionary rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CruzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-17· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. Davido, T., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-15· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. TheveninSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-08· cited 3×
- Ario v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28
- Commonwealth v. Price, N., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-10-19
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,787×
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,424×
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 218×
- Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-05-22· cited 195×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-23· cited 177×
- United States v. Gene Allen HerroldThird Circuit· 1992-06-02· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-04-18· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-22· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-30· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-20· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-24· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. CephasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.