Commonwealth v. Whitaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applications for non-consensual wiretaps cannot be expected to name every person whose communications are in fact intercepted when there are no probable grounds to believe such communications will be intercepted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Shaffer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-06-13· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Barone
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-04-05· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Rainelli
  Centre County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-01-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Kahn
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 457×
• Commonwealth v. Monarch
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-27· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Leta
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-13· cited 4×