Commonwealth v. Warner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• this Court found as too speculative appellant’s assertion that the fact of a defense witness’s occupation as a probation officer when the court inadvertently made it known to the jury warranted a mistrial because of inference of prior criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Polk
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-04· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-29· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Bulard
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-15· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Tabas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-12· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Clipper
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-20· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Mitchell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-28· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Spencer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tervalon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 122×
• Commonwealth v. Riggins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Nichols
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 60×
• Commonwealth v. Starks
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-14· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Van Wright
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Barnes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Ryder
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-21· cited 6×