Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Walker

Citations

  • 954 A.2d 1249
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 182
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2047
  • 2008 WL 3126429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]his Court is an error correcting court; it is not an error-finding court”
  • affirming a trial court’s declaration of mistrial after consideration of less drastic alternatives which could not “unring the bell” regarding improper testimony
  • It is within a trial judge’s discretion to declare a mistrial sua sponte upon the showing of manifest necessity, and appellate court will not disturb the decision absent an abuse of that discretion
  • jeopardy attaches after jury is sworn unless proper mistrial declared
  • “This Court is an error-correcting court; it is not an error-finding court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Stevens, Melvin, Lally-Green, Klein, Bender, Bowes, Gantman, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.