Commonwealth v. Valleca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant convicted of receiving stolen property where he demanded a fee in exchange for property’s return
• defendant has burden of going forward with evidence that he was exempted from prosecution as an accessory after the fact by consanguinity with the principal offenders
• attempt to sell stolen coins back to gallery from which they were stolen in return for \reward\ sufficient to support conviction as accessory after fact to breaking and entering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).