Commonwealth v. Valle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As the driver, the appellant was in control and possession of the vehicle including the trunk and as the case in the trunk was unlocked, it is reasonable to infer that he had knowledge of its contents…[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bentley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-07· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-09-23· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Throckmorton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-28· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Collazo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-24· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Campbell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-12-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Townsend
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-09· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Whitman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-12-12· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Thurman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-11-14· cited 43×
• Evelyn Carol Gaylor v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-04-13· cited 26×
• Collier v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-05-01· cited 7×