Commonwealth v. Union Refrigerator Transit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that based on the plaintiffs’ “request for all of the individual service members’ separation packets[,|” which included at least 26,000 records, “that the plaintiffs’ original request would have imposed an unreasonable burden on the defendants[.]””
• finding that plaintiffs FOIA request posed an unreasonable burden on the agency to review and redact personal identifying informa tion from approximately 26,000 records because doing so would take an estimated twenty-seven years
• explaining that an agency “must provide a relatively detailed justification, specifically identifying the reasons why a particular exemption is relevant and correlating those claims with the particular part of a withheld document to which they apply.”
• requiring affidavits describe structure of agency’s file system sufficiently to show that further search unlikely to disclose additional relevant information
• explaining that to meets its burden, an agency “must provide a relatively detailed justification, specifically identifying the reasons why a particular exemption is relevant and correlating those claims with the particular part of a withheld document to which they apply.”
• rejecting as insufficient a declaration that did “not sufficiently describe the Air Force Surgeon General’s filing system, but instead only identifies two electronic databases that were searched.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).