Commonwealth v. Unger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that oral statements at sentencing not incorporated in the written judgment are not part of the judgment of sentence
• trial judge’s oral statements not incorporated into the written and signed judgment of sentence are not part of the judgment of sentence; oral pronouncement of sentence does not constitute an imposed sentence for double jeopardy purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Ristau
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-20· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-01· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Hodge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-18· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Foster
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-22· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Davy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-22· cited 15×