Commonwealth v. Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating appellant’s attorney sufficiently challenged admissibility of expert testimony though he did not “utter the magic words, ‘I object.’”
• rejecting Commonwealth’s waiver argument where “appellant’s attorney challenged the admissibility of the testimony of [a witness] even though he did not utter the magic words, ‘I object’”
• accessory use may not be principal use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Gaddis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-22· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Ewell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-19· cited 5×
• Barton v. H.D. Riders Motorcycle Club, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-10-31· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Perkins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-03· cited 126×
• Commonwealth v. Adkins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Terrell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-22· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Kollock
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-18· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Irons
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-09-23· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Lee
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-12· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Patterson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Leymeister
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-03· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Balazick
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-16· cited 6×