Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Torres

Citations

  • 469 Mass. 398
  • 14 N.E.3d 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judge evaluates an \affidavit[] submitted in support of a motion for a new trial . . . in light of factors pertinent to credibility\
  • defendant’s affidavit did not raise substantial issue where record refuted his only theory of ineffectiveness
  • \How the expert proceeds with the application of [a method] is usually fertile ground for cross- examination\
  • \Trial judges 'have broad discretion in deciding whether to admit expert testimony'\
  • expert testimony comparing defendant’s footwear to impressions made in blood at crime scene was admissible to assist jury and was properly introduced where “[i]t was made clear to the jury that this was a matter they could weigh for themselves”
  • evidentiary hearing required only when defendant raises substantial issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffly, Gants, Ireland, Lenk, Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.