Commonwealth v. Tompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an order is supported by sub- stantial reason when it articulates the reasoning that leads from the facts found to the conclusions drawn” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Because the board’s order lacks substantial reason, we lack a sufficient basis to meaningfully review the board’s exercise of discretion.”
• “Because the board’s order lacks substantial reason, we lack a sufficient basis to meaningfully review the board’s exercise of discretion.”
• to satisfy the substan- tial reason requirement, “[the board] must articulate how the application of those factors supports the amount of fees awarded” (emphasis in original)
• to satisfy the substan- tial reason requirement, “[the board] must articulate how the application of those factors supports the amount of fees awarded” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).