Commonwealth v. Tisdale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The effect of a trial de novo is that it supplants any prior decision in toto.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-04· cited 147×
• Commonwealth v. Kriegler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-12-01· cited 15×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Karetny
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-15· cited 162×
• Commonwealth v. Santiago
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Wilds
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Gouse
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-15· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. HILL
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-28· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Moore
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-16· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Gordon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-04-03· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Leber
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-25· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Krut
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-25· cited 13×