Commonwealth v. Thompson, C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s “losses from [Defendant’s] breach of contract is sufficient to constitute an unjust loss for the purpose of veil-piercing liability.”
• holding that a breach of contract constitutes a “fraud or wrong” and that losses 9 suffered as a result of that breach are sufficient to constitute an “unjust loss” for the purpose of veil-piercing liability
• finding that transfer of assets essential to running the business, including employees and customers, supported a finding that corporate entity was a mere instrumentality of another
• finding that transfer of assets essential to running the business, including employees and customers, supported a finding that corporate entity was a mere instrumentality of another entity
• concluding under Michigan law that the interests of a controlling shareholder are too unified with the interests of the controlled corporation to ground a tortious interference claim
• “800 (“[T]he fact that [plaintiff] suffered losses from [transferor’s] breach of contract is sufficient to constitute an unjust loss for the purpose of veil-piercing liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).