Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Citations

  • 51 A.3d 255
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 169
  • 2012 WL 3541970
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “while this Court has not addressed the issue of the constitutionality of aggregate weight sentencing schemes as applied to narcotic pills, other state and federal courts have, and all have upheld the constitutionality of similar sentencing schemes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olson, Platt, Wecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.