Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Citations

  • 476 Mass. 451
  • 68 N.E.3d 1161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the relative superiority of competing identification procedures [involving simultaneous versus sequential lineups] is unresolved” (quoting Nat’l Rsch. Council, Nat’l Acad. of Scis., Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification 3 (2014
  • discussing how witness's prior familiarity with defendant is factor in reliability of identification
  • no abuse of discretion in suppressing witness's identification of firearm where \her description of the firearm provided no detail that would suggest that she could identify anything more than its type\
  • where there is no consensus that simultaneous display of photographs is inferior to sequential display, “the decision ... is best left to law enforcement, and the choice will continue to bear on the weight of the identification, but not on its admissibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Botsford, Lenk, Hines, Gaziano, Lowy, Budd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.