Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Thomas

Citations

  • 814 A.2d 754
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 419
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “producing an untimestamped copy of a hearing notice contained in the Clerk of Court’s file, and offering generic testimony as to the standard mailing practices for summary appeal hearing notices” in the county was insufficient
  • holding Commonwealth’s production of unstamped copy of hearing notice contained in clerk of court’s file, and generic testimony regarding standard mailing practices for summary appeal hearing notices, was insufficient to trigger mailbox rule presumption
  • “[Ojffering generic testimony as to the standard mailing procedures for ... notices” is insufficient to trigger the presumption
  • “Although our Court is not bound by decisions of the Commonwealth Court, we may elect to follow those decisions if we find the rationale of those decisions persuasive.”
  • Superior Court not bound by the decisions of the Commonwealth Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Klein, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.