Commonwealth v. Tate, E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in analyzing remittitur, the benchmark is jury awards in comparable cases, not awards remitted by a court
• noting that most cases “do not grapple with the continued use of the maximum recovery rule after Gasperini because the parties often do not raise the Erie issue”
• “The inquiry looks to other published decisions from the relevant jurisdiction (in a diversity case, the forum state) nvolvng comparable facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).