Commonwealth v. Tate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Appellee's reliance on voluntary intoxication cases is without merit as he does not claim that he was under the influence of any substance at the time of the alleged criminal act.\
• “Therefore, any action in this state to recognize voluntary 21 drug addiction, standing alone, as a mental illness is to be accomplished, if ever, by the legislature rather than by judicial decree. Voluntary drug users have not been included within the protections of KRS 501.080(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tamme v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 202×
• Weaver v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-11-25· cited 10×
• Lickliter v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 8×
• Matthews v. Simpson
  W.D. Kentucky· 2009-03-17· cited 5×