Commonwealth v. Tann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once a defendant “violate[s] the terms of his probation, he . . . forfeit[s] the benefit of the expectations that induce his plea, and [is] able to be legally sentenced to the maximum allowed by statute”
• “[U]pon sentencing following a revocation of probation, the trial court is limited only by the maximum sentence that it could have imposed originally at the time of the probationary sentence.” (citation - 15 - J-S05018-25 omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Partee
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-20· cited 77×
• Commonwealth v. Heaster
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-18· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Root
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-02-06· cited 32×
• Com. v. Boyer, F.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-05-24
• Com. v. Slaughter, D., Jr.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-05-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Simmons
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-30· cited 128×
• Commonwealth v. Hodges
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-03· cited 122×
• Commonwealth v. Aponte
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 104×
• Commonwealth v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-29· cited 86×
• Commonwealth v. MacGregor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-21· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Parsons
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-09· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Mazzetti
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-04· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Raphael
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-19· cited 8×