Commonwealth v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “no reasonable and disinterested observer anywhere in the Commonwealth would think [that explicit photographs of men and women engaging in assorted forms of sexual intercourse were] suitable for display to children”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Militello
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-05-24· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Rollins
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-12-09· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Kereakoglow
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-10· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-05-29

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Latimore
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-08-07· cited 1,893×
• Commonwealth v. Trainor
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-04-14· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. United Books, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-08-15· cited 26×
• District Attorney for the Northern District v. Three Way Theatres Corp.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-11-23· cited 17×
• Lewis v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-11· cited 14×
• Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. v. United States
  D. Delaware· 1996-03-07· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Dane Entertainment Services, Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-03-30· cited 4×