Commonwealth v. Stufflet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accused was driving stolen car with no physical manifestation of theft claimed the car was his; evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction for receiving stolen property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Cappelli
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-01· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Middleton
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-28· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Hartz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-01· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Matthews
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-22· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Rooney
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-05· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Whetstine
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-26· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Stufflet
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-16· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Tomasso
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-06· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Wilson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-19· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Moore
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-17· cited 4×