Commonwealth v. Stoddard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “presence of a gate severely restricting general access to the campground is of great significance”
• way was private where lot was gated, commercial, and only accessible with electronic access card
• unpaved, unilluminated, unsigned roadways of a gated campground are not covered under the statute
• \presence of a gate severely restricting general access 3 to the campground\ significant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Belliveau
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-06-01· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Cabral
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-08-05· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Virgilio
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-05-24· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Tsonis
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-10-08
• Correa v. Schoeck
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2016-12-27

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Paccia
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1958-10-29· cited 29×
• Boone v. Commerce Insurance
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-04-17· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Hart
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-07-27· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Whritenour
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-01· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. George
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-02-14· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Smithson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-10-31· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Callahan
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-06-15· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-05-30· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Muise
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-03-28· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Kiss
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-09-09· cited 8×