Commonwealth v. Stevens, M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unfair competitive acts violate Sherman Act only if defendant had significant market power and used unfair means to cripple competitors, thereby affecting competition as required by rule-of-reason
• Executive Department efforts to reduce steel imports via “voluntary imports restraints.”
• defendants’ threats of litigation “reflected only vigorous competition”
• conventional and “pipe-less” recirculation systems for pools

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).