Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/11/1974
Commonwealth v. Stephens
Citations
- 231 Pa. Super. 481
- 331 A.2d 719
- 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- drug dealer’s status as tenant and part-time employee of appellant insufficient to establish conspiracy
- drug dealer's status as tenant and part-time employee of appellant insufficient to establish conspiracy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spabth, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-27· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-14· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-19· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. TaraschiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-13· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-26· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. WaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-07· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. LynchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-05· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. HoetzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-20· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. WaltersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-07· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-08· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. MercadoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-01· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-10· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. DancySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-15· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanLebanon County Court of Common Pleas· 1989-08-15
- Commonwealth v. PalmerChester County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-04-20
- Commonwealth v. CantyBucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1977-01-17
- Commonwealth v. LandMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1981-10-13
- Commonwealth v. EvangelistaFranklin County Court of Common Pleas· 1978-11-15
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 522×
- United States v. FalconeSupreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 436×
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-23· cited 151×
- Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-08-04· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-07· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-09· cited 88×
- Santos Montoya, Jr. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-10-10· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. ReeceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. YobbagySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-03-19· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. HorvathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-09-11· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-03-20· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. WhitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-12-12· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-23· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. SchulhoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-03-23· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. HermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-03· cited 26×
- Dahly v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1931-05-02· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. MinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-11· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. SantanaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-19· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.