Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/20/1969
Commonwealth v. Stauffer
Citations
- 214 Pa. Super. 113
- 251 A.2d 718
- 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- different eligibility for parole for men and women
- different eligibility for parole for men and women
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Hannum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MacKenzieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-09-22· cited 56×
- State v. DevallSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1974-10-28· cited 23×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-11-12· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-28· cited 9×
- State v. DevailSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1974-10-28
- Haas AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-14
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. DanielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-07-01· cited 83×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Monaghan v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-07-19· cited 18×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-06-12· cited 11×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stuckey v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-01-12· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.