Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/31/1986
Commonwealth v. Staten
Citations
- 504 A.2d 301
- 350 Pa. Super. 173
- 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interest of justice test applies to request to reopen case; court abused discretion in denying defense motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Wickersham, Brosky, Rowley, Wieand, Johnson, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. ZollerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. SmalisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-24· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. RidgelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. RouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-03-24· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. CugniniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-19· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-19· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. MartinezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-25· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. StrungeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-15· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-30· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-12-01· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. StatenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.