Commonwealth v. Stantz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s “selective, but vivid recollection” of details surrounding incident indicates that defendant was in control of his faculties
• holding that facts indicating a “plan of deception” negate a finding that a defendant was intoxicated to the point that his faculties and sensibilities were overwhelmed
• even if attorney-client privilege was infringed, no apparent harm resulted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).