Commonwealth v. Stanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing court cannot consider facts set forth in a party’s brief since the matters contained therein are not a part of the record
• stating: “At the very least, it is clear that Appellant failed to interpose an appropriate objection in accordance with the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 1922, and Appellant is bound by the transcript, as lodged”
• appellate court may consider only facts which have been duly certified in the record on appeal
• trial court has discretion with respect to issuance of writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).