Commonwealth v. Standard Investments Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the jail was still “not adequate for detainees with mental-health needs or who were suicidal”
• concluding that the court could review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from a district court's order to the extent the motion was premised on factual or legal changes, but \lack[ed] jurisdiction to review the substance of the [underlying] orders\
• “[T]he only basis for appeal is the Rule 60(b) motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).