Commonwealth v. Stackpole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant in 1964 filed post-verdict motions which raised all issues presented in his (1980
• where appellant was granted a nunc pro tunc appeal, but not the right to file post-verdict motions, and filed within the thirty day period, the Superior Court remanded for disposition of post-verdict motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).