Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Spaulding

Citations

  • 418 A.2d 712
  • 275 Pa. Super. 261
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where suppression court fails to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, a new suppression hearing is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Voort, Spaeth, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.