Commonwealth v. Spady, N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between the lost value of an asset and the lost earnings from that asset
• rejecting the notion that, like lost profits, the value of a lost asset should be determined as of the date of trial
• “First Federal has [correctly] recognized that ‘The Trial Court Awarded Damages Based on the Value of the Foregone Deposits, Not the Earnings that the Foregone Deposits Would have Generated.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).