Skip to main content
· 3/25/2024

Commonwealth v. Snyder, L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the U-4 Form arbitration provision \does not in and of itself bind appellants to arbitrate any particular dispute\
  • noting that the U-4 Form arbitration provision \does not in and of itself bind appellants to arbitrate any particular dispute\
  • noting that the U-4 Form arbitration provision \does not in and of itself bind appellants to arbitrate any particular dispute\
  • noting that the U-4 Form arbitration provision \does not in and of itself bind appellants to arbitrate any particular dispute\
  • analyzing the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as well as Section 118 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 because it amended several sections of Title VII
  • knowing waiver requirement not 21 satisfied because arbitration was never mentioned, the plaintiffs never received the 22 document containing the arbitration provision, and the “provision did not even refer to 23 employment disputes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.