Commonwealth v. Smulsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney’s belief that potential juror has been disingenuous is a legitimate, race-neutral reason
• trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying objection - 18 - J-S17003-17 Commonwealth’s peremptory exclusion of juror thought to be disingenuous and detached from the outside world
• juror properly struck because of past involvement with criminal justice system

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).