Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 266 Pa. 511
- 109 A. 786
- 9 A.L.R. 922
- 1920 Pa. LEXIS 599
Syllabus
<p>Sunday laws — Fairmount Park of Philadelphia — Playing hall— Eqmty — Jurisdiction—Finding of facts — When conclusive on appeal — Act of April 22,179h, 3 Sm. L. 177.</p> <p>1. Where a bill in equity for an injunction, to restrain the park commissioners of Fairmount Park, Philadelphia, from licensing or permitting outdoor games to be played in the park on Sunday, avers that the playing of such games was in violation of the Act of April 22, 1794, 3 Sm. L. 177, and was a public nuisance, and the court below finds as a fact that the evidence failed to prove that a resolution passed by the commissioners, or games played in the park, constituted a public or private nuisance, or that the playing of such games on Sunday had been licensed either by the commissioners or the chief engineer, such finding, although excepted to in the court below, if not assigned as error on appeal, is conclusive, and the appellate court will consider the case as consisting of mere alleged violations of the Act of 1794.</p> <p>2. A court of equity has no jurisdiction to entertain a bill for an injunction to restrain a violation of the Sunday law of April 22, 1794, inasmuch as the act provides a penalty for its violation, and there is therefore an adequate remedy at law. If such penalty is not a sufficient deterrent, it is for the legislature to provide another.</p> <p>3. A crime is an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law either forbidding or commanding it, and a bill in equity will not lie having for its sole purpose an injunction against the mere commission of a crime.</p> <p>Appeals — Practice, Supreme Court — Assignments of error — Statement of questions involved — Exceptions—Hem-say—Evidence.</p> <p>4. Where the appellant’s statement of the questions involved does not include matters complained of in assignments of error, such matters will not be considered by the appellate court.</p> <p>5. WThere no exception is taken to a ruling of the trial court, sustaining an objection
Judges: Brown, Frazer, Kephart, Mosohzisker, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Bravo Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-18· cited 61×
- Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-01-03· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. HartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-01· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-01-03· cited 29×
- In Interest of Tasseing H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-10-10· cited 26×
- Cooper v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-03-22· cited 19×
- Ridgway National Bank, Guardian of the Estate of Robert Aiello, a Mental Incompetent v. North American Van Lines, Inc., an Indiana CorporationThird Circuit· 1964-01-06· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-16· cited 11×
- Diamond v. DiamondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-02-13· cited 9×
- Evans v. RobertsPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1925-03-24
- Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney-General v. Sesqui-Centennial Exhibition Ass'nDauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1926-09-16
- Dobrinski LicenseWyoming County Court of Common Pleas· 1970-07-28
- Commonwealth v. D'AndreaChester County Court of Common Pleas· 1974-03-12
- Commonwealth v. ShermanPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1930-08-22
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sparhawk v. Union Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1867-11-07· cited 63×
- Klein v. Livingston ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-10-05· cited 51×
- Yeager v. Gately & Fitzgerald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 16×
- Kress House Moving Co. v. George Hogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.