Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/10/1983
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 467 A.2d 888
- 321 Pa. Super. 51
- 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining manifest necessity as \a sudden and overwhelming emergency beyond control of court and unforeseeable\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cercone, Cirillo, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-04-22· cited 985×
- Commonwealth v. BartolomucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-01-07· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. CulpepperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-16· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.